© Gianmaria Gava

This section provides links to many of our reports, papers, presentations, books, and blogs. SERI also publishes a newsletter which offers information on the latest developments and insights from our work and highlights current issues in the field of sustainability research and policies.

Browse publications

by Theme
Business | Energy and climate | Economy | Global responsibilty | Integrated strategies | Quality of life | Resource use

by Class
SERI Background Paper | SERI Working Paper | SERI Annual Report | SERI Studies | Journal | Book Chapter |Other working papers | Report | Online publication | Unpublished work | Presentations | Thesis

by Person
Friedrich Hinterberger | Jill Jäger | Doris Schnepf | Stefan Giljum | Ines Omann | Andrea Stocker | Mark Hammer | Lisa Bohunovsky | Fred Luks | Sylvia Lorek | Arno Behrens | Eva Burger | Stephan Lutter | Johannes Frühmann | Martin Bruckner | Elke Pirgmaier | Sigrid Grünberger | Christine Polzin

The economic benefits of environmental policy – Final Report

Rayment, M., Pirgmaier, E., De Ceuster, G., Hinterberger, F., Kuik, O., Leveson Gower, H., Polzin, C. & A. Varma (2009)

Executive summary:

The European Union aspires to become the most dynamic and competitive economy in the world. The Lisbon Strategy, launched by EU leaders in 2000 and subsequently revised and simplified in 2005, emphasises the need to modernise Europe’s economy and focus attention on growth and employment, in order to address the challenges of globalisation and demographic change and to support our wider economic, social and environmental goals. To achieve this, the updated strategy emphasises the need for Europe to become a more attractive place to live and work, to develop knowledge and innovation for growth, and to create more and better jobs.

The current global economic crisis represents a significant setback in implementing Europe’s economic agenda, with problems of loss of demand, unemployment and deteriorating public fi-nances. In order to address these economic problems, restore growth and tackle unemployment, a European Economic Recovery Plan (European Commission, 2008) was launched, which sets out the actions the EU will implement to deal with the crisis.

The European Commission (DG Environment) commissioned GHK, IVM, SERI and TML to as-sess the role of environmental policy measures in the EU’s economic development.

This report describes the areas in which environmental policies deliver Europe’s current eco-nomic priorities, often more successfully than other forms of economic policy intervention. It provides evidence of the role of environmental policy both in providing a short term economic stimulus and in building a sustainable, efficient and resilient economy in the long term. It high-lights many areas where environmental policy is essential for sustainable economic progress.

Download PDF.

Global implications of a European environmental tax reform

Giljum, S., Lutz, C. & Polzin, C. (2010)

European production and consumption activities are increasingly dependent on material and energy resources from abroad and imply significant economic and environmental consequences in other regions around the world. While the overall level of resource use in Europe has stabilised over the past 20 years, the source of these resources has shifted abroad. Altogether, around one third of material and energy resources used by Europe are imported. This substitution of domestic material extraction through international trade of physical imports has also shifted part of Europe’s environmental burden abroad and extends the responsibility for environmental as well as social impacts from the local to the global level. The reserves of the most important resources, especially fossil fuels and metal ores, are located outside of Europe, causing a critical dependence of Europe on other countries and regions. For example, the EU-27 countries only possess 3% of global iron ore reserves, 1% of global oil reserves, and 1% of global uranium reserves. Consequently, for many rare metal ores a very high dependency on imports can be observed. For platinum and tantalum the import rate is 100%, for iron ores 83%, and for bauxite 74%.

In light of Europe’s high and growing dependence on resource imports, the European Union has taken a number of policy measures to address resource security and productivity as well as related environmental concerns. They all highlight access to resources and resource security as key issues for the future success of the European economy. Recognising the impacts that the production and consumption activities within the EU have on other world regions, the European Commission has called for a more sustainable management of natural resources along with a de-coupling of resource consumption and related negative environmental impacts from economic growth in Europe. This strategy should diminish the environmental impact the Union has on the rest of the world and thus contribute to global sustainable development.

With resource security, efficiency and related environmental concerns high on the EU’s agenda, environmental tax reform (ETR) and other market-based instruments to stimulate sustainable and responsible production and consumption have gained widespread interest because they can help address social (mainly employment) and environmental goals.

This paper builds on the results of the project “Resource Productivity, Environmental Tax Reform and Sustainable Growth in Europe” (PETRE), funded by the Anglo-German Foundation. The project aimed at investigating the major economic and environmental implications of improved resource productivity and environmental tax reform (ETR) at different levels, both within the EU and in the global economy. The paper discusses some of the main results of the investigation on the global dimensions of sustainable growth in Europe. The main research questions which guided this analysis included:

  • What are the global consequences of the implementation of an ETR (and thus resource productivity increases) in Europe in terms of world-wide patterns of natural resource extraction, production, trade and consumption?
  • What are the differences between a business-as-usual scenario, a unilateral EU ETR scenario, and a European ETR in combination with wider commitments to emission reductions in other developed countries and economically more advanced developing countries?
  • Which European industries would be most negatively affected in their international competitiveness by the implementation of an ETR in Europe?
  • What are the policy implications of the global effects of an ETR?

The relevance of these questions is underlined by the current discussions at international climate conferences about the impacts of unilateral vs. multilateral policy strategies and on the precise interpretation of ‘common but differentiated responsibilities’, a principle agreed to in the Kyoto Protocol. This paper contributes to the discussion on the roles of the industrialised, emerging and developing countries in dealing with climate change and, more precisely, on the policy impacts of EU vs. international environmental tax reforms.

The main policy conclusion from this paper is that strong concerted action from the EU and emerging countries is needed in order to slow the current growth rate of global CO2 emissions and resource use in order to achieve more environmentally sustainable economic growth.

The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 provides a description of the Global Inter-industry Forecasting System (GINFORS), the integrated simulation model which was used to simulate the scenarios and analyse current and future economic and environmental indicators. Section 3 describes the scenarios. Detailed results are presented and discussed in Section 4. Policy conclusions are derived in Section 5. Section 6 concludes.

Download PDF

A comprehensive set of resource use indicators from the micro to the macro level

Giljum, S., Burger, E., Hinterberger, F. & Lutter, S.

Due to growth of world population, continued high levels of consumption in the developed world, combined with the rapid industrialisation of countries such as China, India and Brazil, worldwide demand on natural resources and related pressures on the environment are steadily increasing. Renewable resources, and the ecological services they provide, are at great risk of degradation and collapse. The depletion of these ecological assets is serious, as human society is embedded within the biosphere and depends on ecosystems for a steady supply of the basic requirements for life: food, water, energy, fibres, waste sinks, and other services. At the same time, extraction of many non-renewable resources is already reaching or near a peak; some authors even describe today’s situation as “peak everything”.

Since the mid-1980s, a certain type of environmental problem became increasingly important, associated with global changes in production, trade and consumption patterns. These problems are more difficult to address, as they are complex, international or even global in scope, and involve multi-dimensional cause-effect-impact relationships and time-lags. Issues such as climate change, loss of biodiversity, land cover conversion and high levels of energy and resource consumption are part of this new type of environmental problems. These problems are more closely related to the overall volume (or scale) of economic activities than a result of the specific potential for environmental harm of single substances. As evidence illustrates, Europe has performed much worse in this regard: many species are threatened by extinction, fish stocks are depleted, water reserves shrink, overall waste volumes have been growing, urban sprawl transforms fertile land into sealed areas, valuable soil is lost through erosion, energy consumption grows, and Europe is far away from achieving a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs).

Given this serious situation, it is necessary to develop systems which measure resource use as well as its environmental, economic, and social impacts through appropriate indicators. What is not measured often gets ignored in policy processes. While standards for measuring greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) have been developed within the UN framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC), such standards on the international level are only beginning to be introduced for the issue of measuring resource use.

Based on a review of existing resource use indicators, this paper suggests a consistent and comprehensive set of resource use indicators. The indicator set comprises the resource input categories of abiotic and biotic materials, water, and land area and considers greenhouse gas emissions as the most important output stemming from natural resource use.

This set of indicators can be applied on all levels of economic activity: from the micro level of products and enterprises, via the meso level of economic sectors to the macro level of countries and world regions. The suggested set of indicators can be regarded as the general indicator framework, based on which more specific indicators (for example, on different environmental impacts) can be calculated.

The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 illustrates the links between different types of natural resource use and various environmental problems stemming from resource use. Section 3 lists criteria for the identification of resource indicator sets. In section 4 we briefly review existing resource use indicators and illustrate their interrelations, in particular, how different categories of resource use are considered in the various indicators. Section 5 provides the suggestion of the resource indicator set, explains the reasons for selecting these indicators and describes, how this indicator set should be applied in practice. Section 6 concludes.

Download PDF

SERI im Standard: Weniger verbrauchen, mehr leben

Unter dem Titel erscheint in der heutigen Printausgabe vom Standard (27.01.2010) ein Artikel, welcher über das Projekt „Lebensklima“ berichtet, welches SERI im Auftrag von Lebensministerium, Land Oberösterreich sowie der Stätde Graz und Gmunden durchführt. Es handelt sich dabei um ein Pilotprojekt für die Ausarbeitung eines neuen Fortschrittsbarometers, der Umwelt- und Lebensqualität als Indikatoren miteinbezieht. “Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen haben gezeigt, dass, obwohl das Einkommen pro Kopf in den reichen Ländern stetig gestiegen ist, die Lebenszufriedenheit gleich geblieben bzw. leicht gesunken ist”, sagt Ines Omann vom SERI im Beitrag.

Der ganze Artikel ist im heutigen Standard zu lesen und in der Onlineausgabe unter: http://derstandard.at/1263706056274/Nachhaltigkeit-Weniger-verbrauchen-mehr-leben

New publication: Climate change as a threat to biodiversity

Ines Omann, Andrea Stocker and Jill Jäger published an article in the  Special Section: The DPSIR framework for Biodiversity Assessment of the Ecological Economics Journal. The new publication “Climate change as a threat to biodiversity: An application of the DPSIR approach” is a result of the Alarm project (Assessing large scale environmental risks for biodiversity with tested methods).

Abstract: Climate change and its consequences present one of the most important threats to biodiversity and the functions of ecosystems. The stress on biodiversity is far beyond the levels imposed by the global climatic changes occurring in the recent evolutionary past. It includes temperature increases, shifts of climate zones, melting of snow and ice, sea level rise, droughts, floods, and other extreme weather events. Natural systems are vulnerable to such changes due to their limited adaptive capacity. Based on an analysis using the DPSIR framework, this paper identifies the socio-economic driving forces of climate change, such as use of fossil fuels or agricultural practices. The paper also analyses possible changes of climate and their effects on biodiversity, the resulting impacts on ecosystem functions, and possible policy responses. The latter can be divided into mitigation and adaptation measures. Both strategies are needed, mitigation in order to stabilise the greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, and adaptation in order to adjust to systems that are already affected. The response to both oil depletion and to climate change through increased biofuel production will change land use patterns and increase human appropriation of net primary production of biomass, thereby threatening biodiversity. By considering the first order and second order impacts of climate change on biodiversity when developing policy measures, it will be possible to integrate ecosystem and biodiversity protection into those processes.

“Green Jobs” – Arbeitsplätze ohne Wachstum

Unter diesem Titel hielt Fritz Hinterberger heute den Eröffnungsvortrag beim “Mariazeller Dialog 2010” zum Thema Umweltforschung, -technik und Ethik. Fazit: Mehr Lebensqualität für alle ist auch ohne Wirtschaftswachstum möglich, wenn es gelingt, die richtigen Rahmenbedingungen zu setzen. Dazu gehört, Arbeit auf mehr Menschen zu verteilen, das Steuersystem umzugestalten und die soziale Sicherung so zu organisieren, dass das hohe, aber nicht unbedingt weiter steigende Sozialprodukt bestmöglich verteilt wird. Die Präsentation gibt es hier (Hinterberger-Mariazell_2010) zum Download.

Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter zum Thema Energiepolitik mit SERI-Beitrag

Wirtschaftspolitische BlaetterDie aktuellste Ausgabe der „Wirtschaftspolitischen Blätter“ widmet sich verschiedenen Aspekten der Energiepolitik. Die SERI-Wissenschaftlerinnen Andrea Stocker und Lisa Bohunovsky beschreiben in ihrem Beitrag die volkswirtschaftlichen Auswirkungen eines Ausbaus von Erneuerbaren Energien. Sie weisen darauf hin, dass alleine der Umstieg auf erneuerbare Energiequellen nicht genügt, um die energie- und klimapolitischen Ziele Österreichs zu erreichen. Es ist eine breite Strategie notwendig, die über Effizienzsteigerungen und Verhaltensänderungen den Energieverbrauch insgesamt reduziert. Der Beitrag basiert auf den Ergebnissen eines EdZ-Forschungsprojektes, in dem österreichische Szenarien zur Nutzung erneuerbarer Energien mithilfe eines integrierten Modells analysiert wurden.

New article: Raw Material Equivalents of International Trade

This new article, co-authored by Stefan Giljum and published in the Journal of Industrial Ecology, estimates the material flows required along the whole production chains of imports and exports for selected Latin American countries: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and Mexico. These indirect material flows (also called “ecological rucksacks”) of imports and exports are calculated as “raw material equivalents”, i.e. each material incorporated in a product (e.g. plastics or steel) is transformed into its equivalent of primary resource extraction (e.g. oil or crude iron ore). Results are set out for the year 2003 for each of the countries and in time series for the years 1977, 1986, 1996, and 2003 in the case of Chile. The findings show that including these indirect material flows is important, when calculating resource use indicators for Latin American countries, which export large amounts of primary commodities. For example in the case of Chile, the trade balance in terms of material flows is almost balanced, when only direct material flows are considered. However, when the ecological rucksacks of the exported products are included in the calculation, the trade balance is clearly negative (i.e. Chile exporting much higher amounts of resources than importing from the rest of the world). The results support SERIs demand to use comprehensive resource use indicators (including ecological rucksacks) to evaluate global resource flows and resource consumption of countries and world regions.

For more information about this article, click here.

Neuer Artikel: Arbeitsplätze ohne Wachstum?

Fritz Hinterberger behandelt in einem neuen Artikel (in: Agrarische Rundschau 5/09) die hochaktuelle Fragestellung, ob es auch ohne Wirtschaftswachstum genug Arbeitsplätze geben kann.

Fazit: Mehr Lebensqualität für alle ist auch ohne weiteres Wirtschaftswachstum möglich, wenn es gelingt, die richtigen Rahmenbedingungen zu setzen. Dazu gehört, Arbeit auf mehr Menschen zu verteilen, das Steuersystem umzugestalten und die soziale Sicherheit so zu organisieren, dass das hohe, aber nicht unbedingt weiter steigende Sozialprodukt bestmöglich verteilt wird. Für die Einzelnen bedeutet das weniger Stress und möglicherweise kürzere Arbeitszeiten und mehr Zeit, eine gute Lebensqualität wirklich zu genießen. Anstrengungen der Wirtschaft, der Politik und jedes Einzelnen sind nötig, um zu erreichen, was alle wollen: ein gutes Leben.

Artikel als PDF: Arbeitsplätze ohne Wachstum?

SERI investigates global responsibility for CO2 emissions

In a new project for the German Development Institute (DIE) we look at the embodied CO2 emissions in international trade and the global climate responsibility of consumption. We will show

  • which countries and regions are the biggest net importers and net exporters of embodied CO2 emissions from international trade,
  • how production outsourcing and relocation processes between OECD and non-OECD countries have developed between 1995 and 2005,
  • the size of the shifts of CO2 emissions between different continents through international trade
  • the influence of considering consumer responsibility on the goals of a post-Kyoto or post-Copenhagen agreement

For more information on this new project please click here.

Feed von SERI abonnieren SERI auf Twitter folgen Fan von SERI werden SERI speichern
SERI Infomail | Archiv
Language